From an Anonymous Correspondant:

Hi there,

I'm just writing because someone has to point out the Truth, sort-of... I liked your tongue-in-cheek flying pig concept so much that I have a new theory to what it could have been.

(http://thewebfairy.com/911/flyingpig)

This highly experimental FlapJack. Of course, this was designed for the Navy way back when I was a kid, it has the exact kind of capabilities that the Flying pig has, but with significant improvements!

Notice the weapons that can easily blast holes into WTC-1 before impact, but since it's a flapping plane, the entry hole will be much wider making the appearance of longer wings... The unique flapping wing movement can be clearly seen in the Naudet footage...Sorry, Pavel Hlava didn't catch this- in his amazing film. Since it's made of a soft plastic rather than aluminum, it slips into the building quicker and more quietly than a 'squeeky ole pig' might or for that matter, Flight 175. It uses 2 AA bateries for power, though I think they're using some stronger ones for the larger version.

It came in a kit that used the amazing Snap-tite technology! The ones used for 9/11 were really, the full size versions that the Air-force now uses in their tactical defense demonstrations and also for the Crowd-pleasing ?clown plane? used when they have those airshows with the Blue Angels making a fly-over to commemorate a new Mega-Mall somewhere in Texas...

That's all,

I hope this has helped because the Naudet footage sure gave away too much information about the methods used anyway. Have you noticed that nobody has made an effort to study shock waves on the WTC surfaces, dust that had built-up in cracks and crevices in between the support columns or exterior skins? The sudden shift in the building swaying back and forth? On an average day the WTC could sway in any direction a total of 14 feet from the rooftop in a light breeze!!!!! You could actually see the building sway if the camera was on a locked tripod. Imagine, just imagine how it would look if the building was hit by a 767 Jet and had to react. Check that footage again...I never saw that building move one god-damn inch! I hope for ' Oliver Stones' sake he used better computer animators (in his conspiramentry movie) than the ones who worked on the 9/11 FX-show.

Keep up the good work, I enjoy your site because it brings the Eye into Ironic. People see what they want, when they really look thru the looking-glass.

I give you permission to reprint or use the pictures, its from the internet anyway... Please don't use or mention my name should you include this in your studies, articles, or websites and/or any other medias therefore not aforementioned. I'm happy to do my own research and make my own studies, I just do these studies for my own personal needs.

Thanks for your kind attention to detail in this subject.